If you're new to this one, I decided (and I confess, I might have been drinking,...) to sign up for emails from the campaigns of all the contenders who qualified for the 'single-stage' debate in Houston earlier this month. The point? To see what's on their mind, and what they want to be on my mind as I look to find a candidate with whom I can move forward.
Here's the link to last week's update, which includes updates to all of the previous articles in this series, and the highlights from the post:
How did we do in week three?And this week?
- I received 175 emails by this afternoon's deadline, 35 more than last week; 76% directly asked for money.
- Kamala Harris sent me 29 emails, followed by Cory Booker (24), Joe Biden (22), and Elizabeth Warren (20). At the other end of the scale, Bernie Sanders and Julian Castro (12 each) were trailed only by Amy Klobuchar (8)...
- On the asking for money part, Sanders led the way, with 92% of his emails making a direct pitch for money. He was followed closely by Warren (90%) and Klobuchar (88%). The one asking for money the least? Beto, with only 65% of his emails making a blatant pitch.
- Email volume overall was down. I only received 159, compared to last week's 175, but the percentage that directly asked for money was up -- from 76% to 82% (131 emails).
- Individually, most of them slowed down at least a little, since we didn't have a debate staring us in the face. Kamala Harris reached out the most, with 27 emails. Joe Biden (23), Cory Booker (21) and Elizabeth Warren (19) were also in the top tier, with Andrew Yang (14), Beto O'Rourke, (13), Amy Klobuchar, Bernie Sanders and Julian Castro (11 each) and Mayor Pete (9) rounding out the list.
- Who wanted my money the most? That would be Andrew Yang; 100% of his emails had a direct ask for money. Biden and Klobuchar (91%), Harris (85%), Booker (81%) and Warren (80%) were also pretty good at pushing the donations. Buttigieg (78%), Sanders (73%), Beto (62%) and Castro (60%) trailed here.
It's a lot of pressure on me, I have to say.
What else are they talking about? Trump and Ukraine, especially the Biden team. Impeachment and how much fun they're having in Iowa are common to all campaigns. Beto's still talking a little about pot, more about guns. And Bernie? He wants to wipe out billionaires. Seriously - take a look at these excerpts from his email with the subject "Billionaires should not exist"
And in order to reduce the outrageous level of inequality that exists in America today and to rebuild the disappearing middle class, the time has come for the United States to establish an annual tax on the extreme wealth of the top 0.1 percent of U.S. households.
Our tax on extreme wealth would only apply to the wealthiest households in America and would cut the wealth of billionaires in half over 15 years — which would substantially break up the concentration of wealth and power of this small, privileged class.
Now, I have never understood how someone could have tens and hundreds of billions of dollars and feel the desperate need for even more. I would think that with the amount of money the 0.1 percent of this country has, they might just be able to get by.I'm curious as to why Sanders only wants to take away half of their wealth, or how he thinks they'll have less power if they only have $50B instead of $100B or more, and why he thinks they feel the desperate need for more money. I guess they're supposed to just quit their jobs and shutter their companies to avoid making more? (Clearly, as regular readers know, I'm not a Sanders fan.)
As with prior weeks, they are not talking about jobs (0 emails), education (0), the economy (1), immigration (0), foreign policy (0), climate change (1) or barely mention health insurance (2). Warren has updated both her shopping options and her website with a special place just for her plans.
With the end-of-quarter FEC deadline only four days away, I expect the money pressure to ramp up significantly over the next couple of days. I also expect to see more emails about Trump, impeachment, and the debate requirements after today's goings-on in DC.
Stay tuned.
Sanders is a hard pass. Where'd Tulsi go? I didn't even hear she dropped out... oh she hasn't. I saw this today:
ReplyDelete"Her exclusion from the upcoming debate came after she took a two-week break from campaigning in order to fulfill her National Guard active-duty training obligations. Her campaign noted that she "exceeded 2% support in 26 national and early state polls, but only two of them are on the DNC’s ‘certified’ list."
I had mentioned earlier there had been some negative publicity for her regarding Russian support; here's a link to that. (https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/460231-tulsi-gabbard-on-online-russian-support-they-agree-its-better-when-were-not) - not sure whether that's playing into her polling in Iowa. 2% first choice, 1% second choice, and only 12% actively considering her.
ReplyDeleteThis article talks about her Syria positions, calling them disqualifying (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/tulsi-gabbards-syria-record-shows-why-she-cant-be-president/2019/08/01/f804c790-b497-11e9-8949-5f36ff92706e_story.html).
I did find a more nuanced article from earlier in September. (https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/09/tulsi-gabbard-2020-candidate/597226/) explaining why she's running, but I don't know who her core constituencies are. She used to be DNC, quit because it was 'rigged' against Sanders (don't get me started on that) and she worked for him after quitting the DNC.
I don't know if anyone knows enough about her, really.