April 17, 2013

For The Record

Here's a list of the Senators who voted against expanding background checks for gun purchases today.

Senator Party State
Jeff Sessions Republican Alabama
Richard Shelby Republican Alabama
Mark Begich Democratic Alaska
Lisa Murkowski Republican Alaska
Jeff Flake Republican Arizona
John Boozman Republican Arkansas
Mark Pryor Democratic Arkansas
Marco Rubio Republican Florida
Saxby Chambliss Republican Georgia
Johnny Isakson Republican Georgia
Mike Crapo Republican Idaho
Jim Risch Republican Idaho
Dan Coats Republican Indiana
Chuck Grassley Republican Iowa
Jerry Moran Republican Kansas
Pat Roberts Republican Kansas
Mitch McConnell Republican Kentucky
Rand Paul Republican Kentucky
David Vitter Republican Louisiana
Thad Cochran Republican Mississippi
Roger Wicker Republican Mississippi
Roy Blunt Republican Missouri
Max Baucus Democratic Montana
Deb Fischer Republican Nebraska
Mike Johanns Republican Nebraska
Dean Heller Republican Nevada
Harry Reid Democratic Nevada
Kelly Ayotte Republican New Hampshire
Richard Burr Republican North Carolina
Heidi Heitkamp Democratic North Dakota
John Hoeven Republican North Dakota
Rob Portman Republican Ohio
Tom Coburn Republican Oklahoma
Jim Inhofe Republican Oklahoma
Lindsey Graham Republican South Carolina
Tim Scott Republican South Carolina
John Thune Republican South Dakota
Lamar Alexander Republican Tennessee
Bob Corker Republican Tennessee
John Cornyn Republican Texas
Ted Cruz Republican Texas
Orrin Hatch Republican Utah
Mike Lee Republican Utah
Ron Johnson Republican Wisconsin
John Barrasso Republican Wyoming
Mike Enzi Republican Wyoming

And here's a list of the Senators who voted in favor of expanding background checks.

Senator Party State
John McCain Republican Arizona
Barbara Boxer Democratic California
Dianne Feinstein Democratic California
Michael Bennet Democratic Colorado
Mark Udall Democratic Colorado
Richard Blumenthal Democratic Connecticut
Chris Murphy Democratic Connecticut
Tom Carper Democratic Delaware
Chris Coons Democratic Delaware
Bill Nelson Democratic Florida
Mazie Hirono Democratic Hawaii
Brian Schatz Democratic Hawaii
Dick Durbin Democratic Illinois
Mark Kirk Republican Illinois
Joe Donnelly Democratic Indiana
Tom Harkin Democratic Iowa
Mary Landrieu Democratic Louisiana
Susan Collins Republican Maine
Angus King Independent Maine
Ben Cardin Democratic Maryland
Barbara Mikulski Democratic Maryland
Mo Cowan Democratic Massachusetts
Elizabeth Warren Democratic Massachusetts
Carl Levin Democratic Michigan
Debbie Stabenow Democratic Michigan
Al Franken Democratic Minnesota
Amy Klobuchar Democratic Minnesota
Claire McCaskill Democratic Missouri
Jon Tester Democratic Montana
Jeanne Shaheen Democratic New Hampshire
Frank Lautenberg Democratic New Jersey
Bob Menendez Democratic New Jersey
Martin Heinrich Democratic New Mexico
Tom Udall Democratic New Mexico
Kirsten Gillibrand Democratic New York
Chuck Schumer Democratic New York
Kay Hagan Democratic North Carolina
Sherrod Brown Democratic Ohio
Jeff Merkley Democratic Oregon
Ron Wyden Democratic Oregon
Bob Casey, Jr. Democratic Pennsylvania
Pat Toomey Republican Pennsylvania
Jack Reed Democratic Rhode Island
Sheldon Whitehouse Democratic Rhode Island
Tim Johnson Democratic South Dakota
Patrick Leahy Democratic Vermont
Bernie Sanders Independent Vermont
Tim Kaine Democratic Virginia
Mark Warner Democratic Virginia
Maria Cantwell Democratic Washington
Patty Murray Democratic Washington
Joe Manchin Democratic West Virginia
Jay Rockefeller Democratic West Virginia
Tammy Baldwin Democratic Wisconsin

April 16, 2013

Tuesday's Number: $296,092

Tuesday is the day my local paper, the Syracuse Post-Standard, publishes the weekly business section. In addition to special features, tips from stock experts, budgeting advice and the like, we get the judgment and bankruptcy listings. 

As I did for much of last year, I will be tracking health care related filings. I include anything that is clearly a debt owed to a hospital, nursing home, physician or physician group, medical supplier, and so on; I do not include filings by insurance companies, many of which are so diversified it would not be a fair assumption that the filing is related to medical care or health insurance. 

This week, eleven people were listed with new judgments totaling $250,606 to hospitals, doctors, or other medical providers.  

This week, there were no listings for satisfied judgments to a hospital, doctor, or other medical provider. 

And this week, there were two health-care related bankruptcies listed, totaling $45,486.

The paper publishes only those accounts of at least $5,000.

April 13, 2013

Knock Knock. Who's there? A Republican (Pt. 1)

A Republican Who?

A Republican who...believes that the only reason for having sex is for procreation. 

Thank you, Montana, for giving us Representative Dave Hagstrom.  Because without him, there might be some confusion about the valid reasons for having sex.
 Official photo

 
This subject came up during discussion on a bill being considered by the Montana state legislature that would change the law which currently defines deviate sexual relations a "sexual contact or sexual intercourse between two persons of the same sex or any form of sexual intercourse with an animal."  The bill, if passed and signed, would strike the same-sex reference but leave the animal reference intact.

Hagstrom actually knows some gay people. Or so he says.
I have a whole lot of love and respect for a whole number of homosexual friends. So there is no homophobic issues going on here at all with me...
Well, maybe he knows some gays, or maybe not -- after all, zero is a whole number.

Here's Hagstrom's analogy about primary and secondary purposes of objects.
I kinda likened it to this pen. This pen has two purposes.  The first purpose of course is to write. The second purpose is to retract so that it doesn't leave a stain on your shirt or your purse.  So that's two purposes.
For a second there, I was afraid he was going to say something about a stain on a dress... but I digress. Back to purposes:
But one is primary, the other is secondary. To me sex is primarily purposed to produce people, that's why we're all here... sex that doesn't produce people is deviant. That doesn't mean that it is a problem. It just means it's not doing its primary purpose.  
So...'non-productive' sex is deviant. Which means that, in addition to gays, any heterosexual people out there who are having sex with no intention of producing an heir are deviants.

This would include both the young and the restless and the moldy oldies.

Those who are married or single, shacking up or hooking up.

Politicians and pawnbrokers. Preachers and teachers. Jokers, smokers, and midnight tokers.

Hagstrom 'clarified' his remarks when questioned, stating that the video did not include the second part of his statement, that the secondary purpose of sexual activity was for pleasure, and he included both heterosexual and homosexual pleasure. He wanted to be on the record on that -- and the fact that his 'no' vote didn't matter.  
I'd strike out the whole section which created a felony for any kind of deviate sexual behavior, because it's archaic and ridiculous. And the Supreme Court has ruled it unconstitutional so it's a moot point.  Obviously it's not criminal. Not in the least bit is it criminal. But that's a moot point. Nobody's ever been tried and convicted under that. It's been killed by our Supreme Court.
Which is why, I guess, he and 33 other Republicans, who "affirm the unalienable right to  life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all individuals" voted against the bill. 

Seems they, too, might have primary and secondary purposes?

Knock knock.

The Update Desk: 4/13/13

Updates and random thoughts:

First,  We Deserve a Vote, and we're going to get one.

On Thursday, the Senate voted to go ahead and begin considering new gun control legislation.  The vote that killed a possible filibuster was 68 -31, with 29 Republicans and 2 Democrats voting against the measure, and sixteen Republicans, 50 Dems, and 2 Independents voting in favor.

There's absolutely no guarantee that any legislation will pass (including a bipartisan take on background checks) once they start considering the actual proposed laws -- and that's perfectly OK.  The point is that the Senate will at least allow the measures to be considered, and that they will put their decisions on the record.  We all win when that happens.

Meanwhile, back in NY, I just found online that Preet Bharara, the US Attorney who's working on cleaning up Albany one dirty politician at a time, made the Time magazine list of the World's Most Influential People for 2012.  According to the article, written by Georgetown law professor and Bharara friend Viet Dinh, he's quite the guy:
What sets Preet, 43, apart is his ability to see the next battleground — witness the takedown of members of the Anonymous and LulzSec hacker networks. What sets him above is the patience honed by principle. For years, as others clamored for scalps after the global financial crisis, Preet resisted the temptation of a sloppy kill and instead waited for the facts. His 58-0 record for insider-trading cases bodes ill for the bankers whom his office has charged with reckless lending practices or inflating mortgage values.
And finally, here in Syracuse, we learned that SU sophomore point guard Michael Carter-Williams is entering the NBA draft. While not surprising, it's disheartening. I naively hope that the kids will realize that very few players actually make it in the NBA; SU in particular doesn't have that great a track record turning kids in to pros. Most of them would have been better off staying in school, getting a degree and having something to do for the rest of their life.

Almost immediately after SU's loss to Michigan in the semi-finals, reporters started asking MCW what his intentions were for the future, whether he'd take his 12 points and 7 assists per game to the next level; left unsaid of course was the part about him giving up on getting an education. Initially he said he wasn't thinking about that, but very quickly made the decision to go, where he's projected to be a lottery pick, depending on who else decides to declare for the draft.

I know the reporters think they are doing their jobs when they throw the NBA question to underclassmen at the end of the season; but boy, what I wouldn't give for someone to ask not the obvious question, but something along the lines of this:
The first game of the season was months ago, back on November 1st.  You had a great run, but tell me -- aren't you looking forward to being able to get back to your studies full time, now that the season is over?
Ah well, maybe someday.

April 9, 2013

We Deserve A Vote

We deserve a vote. Plain and simple.

I have my own views on whether we need additional gun control laws; I've made them pretty clear in this forum (click on the label 'guns' at the end of this post) but I'll run through them one more time:
  • I support the right of people to bear arms; I do no believe all guns need to be banned.
  • I do not believe the government is planning on confiscating everyone's guns.
  • I believe in background checks for all gun sales, and I believe all states should fully participate in the background check program.
  • I would prefer that we don't have weapons and ammunition options that allow sick evil bastards to murder lots of people in a very short period of time.
  • I believe there is a significant difference between firearms and bathtubs.
Here are some other things I strongly believe in:
  • Gun control legislation - whether advocating for more of it or less of it - should come to a vote on the floor of the House and Senate, without any unrelated amendments. Just gun control, and a vote.
  • I believe that all of our elected representatives should go on the record when it matters, and actually record a vote, in their name, for posterity, on gun control. They should not be able to hide behind the filibuster, or behind a microphone, saying what they want without having any accountability to us.
  • I believe that the leadership of the House and Senate should bring gun legislation forward, regardless of whether they have the votes or not, because we deserve to know where the people we elect really stand on this issue.  (Frankly I feel this way about most legislation but that's a whole nother conversation).
There are a dozen or so conservative Republicans who have suggested a filibuster on gun legislation.  While it appears that some of their counterparts may be moving away from this idea and are now willing to actually vote, I would ask the rest of them this:
What are you afraid of?   If you are on the right side of this issue, shouldn't you be proud to vote down anything new gun legislation that comes before you?  If you are confident you're acting with the support of your constituents, as opposed to acting on the advice of the NRA, ALEC, gun manufacturers or other lobbying organizations, why won't you stand up and vote against proposed gun legislation?  If you truly believe that there is no need to change existing gun laws, why not say so when it matters?
Our political process makes it very easy for our representatives to hide from making hard choices, and very easy for their leadership to fail us.  According to many polls, support for broader background checks is as high as 91%; as many as 61% believe we need stricter gun control laws; more than half believe we need to control guns more than we need to protect the rights of gun owners; as many as 70% believe it's OK to restrict gun rights in some way; as many as 72% believe there should be a mental health check for all gun buyers.

We've made our opinions clear. We deserve to know if Congress is listening to what we say we want, or if they're listening to what someone else wants. 

We deserve a vote.

Tuesday's Number: $337,033

Tuesday is the day my local paper, the Syracuse Post-Standard, publishes the weekly business section. In addition to special features, tips from stock experts, budgeting advice and the like, we get the judgment and bankruptcy listings. 

As I did for much of last year, I will be tracking health care related filings. I include anything that is clearly a debt owed to a hospital, nursing home, physician or physician group, medical supplier, and so on; I do not include filings by insurance companies, many of which are so diversified it would not be a fair assumption that the filing is related to medical care or health insurance. 

This week, sixteen people were listed with new judgments totaling $267,703 to hospitals, doctors, or other medical providers.  

This week, two people were listed as having satisfied judgments totaling $41,715 to a hospital, doctor, or other medical provider.  

And this week, there were three health-care related bankruptcies listed, totaling $27,615.
 
The paper publishes only those accounts of at least $5,000

April 7, 2013

The Dirty Snowpile Awards for 2013

All the big Hollywood award shows are over, Ben Affleck has shaved off his beard, and the good, bad, and ugly of fashion have been all been identified. And now, as the temperature here in Syracuse heads north of 60 degrees, it's time for the Dirty Snowpile Awards. I'm sure this year's winners will be just as proud as those from  2010 and 2011  to receive this prestigious honor.

So where do we start?  We had a lot of material to choose from, no question about that -- and we have a repeat winner or two this time around, some 'defending champions', if you will.  Here goes:

The 'Put an Idiot Bumper Sticker on your Own Forehead' Dirty Snowpile goes to John Sununu, for his engaging and idiotic appearance with Soledad O'Brien on CNN.  Sununu, who suggested O'Brien put an Obama bumper sticker on her forehead, was trying to make a point by referencing an actual document - the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) assessment on the costs of repealing the
Affordable Care Act - and pretending it said the ACA cut Medicare benefits by over $700 billion.  This was not the case, but it didn't matter to Sununu - say something loud enough and often enough and people will believe you.  Unless it's Soledad O'Brien, who actually read the CBO letter and called Sununu on the lie- er, misstatement.

The 'Groucho Marx' Dirty Snowpile goes to National Rifle Association (NRA) Executive Director Wayne LaPierre, for embodying the oft-cited Groucho quote about belonging to a club that would have him as a member. LaPierre, by his comments after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings, his statements after other mass shootings that it was 'too soon' to talk about them, and his inflammatory statements since then, has done more to fan the flames of gun control advocates than the horrific shootings themselves.  The NRA would do themselves a favor if they found another mouthpiece.


The 'Talk Less, Do More' Dirty Snowpile goes to jointly to Congress and President Obama. All of them need to get to work.  Recent attempts at playing nice (Obama taking Senate Republicans to dinner, or having lunch with House Republicans) are fine but we don't need any more photo ops. We know what you all look like, we know what you think is important -- but we don't need photo opportunities, we need real opportunities.  Remember what they say: "you can't always get what you want, but if you try sometimes, you just might find, you get what you need." Now's the time to try.

On a related note, the 'Who the (Heck) are You' Dirty Snowpile goes to the handful of people who still approve of Congress.  Approval rates have fluctuated a bit over the past several months, but I don't remember when it was even as high as 20%. I'm reminded of when we were kids, not excited about eating our vegetables.  Dad would tell us there were starving kids in other countries who would love to have our food, one day, my brother challenged him to name one. Can anyone name one of these 'approvers'?

And then we have the 'Wading Through Roe v. Wade' Dirty Snowpile to, well, to everyone - male or female, Democrat or Republican - who said anything about rape and abortion in the last election cycle.  We had Akin  and women's bodies 'shutting that thing down' and Mourdock with 'God's intent' and jokes about aspirin being a contraceptive and Louise Slaughter with her Nazi references -- it's all nonsense.  If people want to try and legislate abortion away, so be it -- it will be up to the courts, ultimately, to decide whether any new law are legal. In the meantime, can we please just stop letting the stupid people talk about it?


The thing about dirty snowpiles is, the dirtier they are, the longer they stick around. Sometimes it feels like that with our elected officials, doesn't it? It's a pretty good thing that you can control the budget of the agency you formed to investigate your own allegedly bad behavior, isn't it? Kind of makes it hard for that agency to do a good job, when with the stroke of a pen the funding can be cut. But that's the way it works for the Congressional Ethics Office, under the House Ethics Committee.  And speaking of ethics, say goodbye to Jesse Jackson Jr. (and his wife) who agreed to fess up to stealing money from campaign contributors. Let's give these folks the 'House (of Cards) Ethics' Dirty Snowpile; this one looks ready to tumble over any minute.

And what about the Presidential contest last year? Lots of Republicans, fighting each other, and in the end they all lost. Not because they were bad, but because of which one of them won. And so, the 47% Dirty Snowpile goes to none other than Mitt Romney. We all remember the 47% comment, right? That, and all those gifts that Obama gave to voters. Yeah, that's what it was, the 47% and those stinking gifts.

Albany has its own set of issues, apart from the fun that everyone has in Washington.  Here in New York, we have Andrew Cuomo, that Sonova Governor, who was elected fairly easily.  Now, apparently, he thinks he's the Supreme Commander of the Empire (State -- you're the Governor of the Empire State, Andrew). It doesn't, but apparently no one's told him that yet.

Cuomo earned One Man in a Room Dirty Snowpile. Cuomo blew a perfectly good opportunity to craft legitimate gun legislation; he shot it all to hell, actually, by pushing an emergency bill, and by not focusing on the things that people generally agree on. Instead, the NY SAFE Act, shoved down the throats of New Yorkers, satisfies no one.  Typos and bad law passed under cover of darkness (led by the Transparency Governor) don't make NY SAFE.  They make us look like morons.

And speaking of morons. The 'My Future's So Bright, I Have to be a Republican' Dirty Snowpile goes to State Senator Malcolm Smith, the sitting Democrat who tried to bribe his way into the Bloomberg Post as a Republican. I'm not sure whether this says more about his creativity or the foolishness of his partners in crime, so anxious to have any politician in their pocket they'd take one of any stripe.

There will be more to fall as Preet Bharara, the rising star US Attorney for the Southern District of NY, continues to investigate. And that will be a good thing for all of us who lose a little bit of faith in the system each and every year.

Sadly, I could hand out as many awards as there are dirty snowpiles here in Syracuse during an average spring. And even though temps are starting to get up there, we do still have a couple of dirty snowpiles left in town.  So, I'll do one more -- we'll have an even 10 this year.

The 'Make Mine a Single' Dirty Snowpile goes to local State Senator John DeFrancisco, for applauding himself for not double-dipping (retiring to collect a pension and continuing to collect a salary as a legislator at the same time).   While some think it's laudable that he chose not to double-dip, DeFrancisco's comments when questioned by a reporter left a few things to be desired.  He started out OK, noting that he wasn't really retired, and I agree that seems pretty simple and straightforward.  But then, he added
If I get hit by a car tomorrow and I died, it would be a $100,000 benefit, which is probably about two years pension and then my wife has nothing further. That's a real concern. 
Yeah, that's a real concern for everyone who works, Senator, including the taxpayers who support your $113,000 salary and who will be paying the $50,000 pension you've earned on your part-time job.  But we're glad you're taking care of yourself first, we really are.

And with that, the snow shovel is in the shed until next winter.

April 3, 2013

The Update Desk: 4/3/2013

A couple of updates for you on some recent posts.

First, I now know a lot more about the umbrella factory that's being proposed for my neighborhood.

You'll recall I was hoping it would either be those little cocktail umbrellas, or else the big patio umbrellas - both of which I'd be willing to QC.  Turns out that it's actually going to be artistic umbrellas, if it gets approved. And I stand corrected: even though the postcard from the Zoning Board of Appeals seemed to be directing me to stop by and visit them, to see the proposal, I was able to find it online. You can check out things that might be happening in your neighborhood here.

The homeowner is an artist specializing in inspirational designs, and will take care of printing the umbrella fabric with his designs.  The 'factory' aspect comes in because there will be one employee, working one day a week, turning the stamped fabric into umbrellas.  The end products will be sold online, of course, but also at at religious conferences and to churches. 

My neighbor even went so far as to engage a couple of law students from SU to help with the application. Overall it seemed like a pretty good package. Minutes from the meeting haven't been posted yet, so I'm not sure if the proposal was approved.  

Next, you all know how unimpressed I was with the suggestion by Common Councilor Jake Barrett that Syracuse might want to offer an amnesty program for parking ticket scofflaws, before ramping up booting efforts.  The boot locks the car and won't get removed until the tickets are cleared. 

Not surprisingly, I was not the only one who thought that was a dumb idea - especially after the Post-Standard published the list of the top 55 illegal parkers.  Number one on the list owed close to $8,000 for his tickets, which were collected between 1997 and 2011.  Another person, according to the article, was paying off her debt - over $4,100 - at the rate of $25 per month. At least she's trying. And of course, there's an elected official on the list, because it wouldn't be nearly as much fun without one.

The best part, other than the amnesty idea being dead on arrival, was that this past Monday, the Common Council approved the contract with PayLock, the company that currently provides the boots, so we're going to start collecting some much-needed cash for the city coffers. The three-year deal with PayLock also means that we won't be paying Syracuse's Finest to handle the booting, which was logically a low priority.

Can you say win, win, win?

April 2, 2013

Tuesday's Number: $972,129

Tuesday is the day my local paper, the Syracuse Post-Standard, publishes the weekly business section. In addition to special features, tips from stock experts, budgeting advice and the like, we get the judgment and bankruptcy listings.  

As I did for much of last year, I will be tracking health care related filings. I include anything that is clearly a debt owed to a hospital, nursing home, physician or physician group, medical supplier, and so on; I do not include filings by insurance companies, many of which are so diversified it would not be a fair assumption that the filing is related to medical care or health insurance.  

This week, thirty-two people were listed with new judgments totaling $768,169 to hospitals, doctors, or other medical providers.   

This week, five people were listed as having satisfied judgments totaling $194,391 to a hospital, doctor, or other medical provider.   

And this week, there was one health-care related bankruptcy listed, totaling $9,569.   

The paper publishes only those accounts of at least $5,000.

March 26, 2013

Thirteen Tuesdays: $7,823,264

Almost eight million dollars.

That's the total of the 311 health care-related filed judgments, satisfied judgments, and bankruptcies from the last thirteen Tuesdays, going back to January 1, 2013.

Add that to the 24-week totals from the my tracking last year, and you have 859 families and $19,482,613 of financial pain and suffering.

As I pointed out last year, this is not even 'close-enough-for-government-work' accounting.  That level of accuracy would require me to pay attention to who the specific people are, and I don't want to get into that level of detail.  There could be duplicates here - the same amount appearing in the 'filed' section one week and the 'satisfied' section another. But even in the face of that - pretend it's 50% duplication -- it's still well over $9.7 million dollars, just in our Central New York area, in about nine months. 

In my earlier post, I pointed out that
I don't know the circumstances that landed these folks in this section of the paper. I don't have the faintest idea whether they had jobs, if they had health insurance through their employers, if their insurance company denied the claims, if they were hanging by a thread in any of the safety net programs that are available to folks in New York, or if they made a conscientious choice not to pay their bills, in which case their landing in this particular section of the paper could have been avoided.
I do know that the vast majority of the filings were from our three local hospitals, and that according to their websites, all of the facilities - St Joseph's Hospital Health Center, Crouse Hospital, and SUNY Upstate Medical University - offer some kind of financial assistance, ranging from helping get patients into insurance programs to reduced payments or payment plans.
In addition to efforts by the facilities themselves, those of us who have insurance, and our insurance companies, and many of our health care providers, contribute to indigent care programs through surcharges tacked on to certain medical bills; and all of us support safety net programs through the taxes we pay. So basically, everyone's trying, here - whether by choice or by default - to help get medical bills paid. The hope is that between private health insurance, government safety net programs, and other funding arrangements, we'll continue to have access to quality care when we need it.
And now, thirteen weeks later? Three hundred eleven more families. Almost eight million dollars more.

On March 23rd, the anniversary of the signing of the Affordable Care Act, President Obama noted that
In the wealthiest country on earth, no one should go broke just because they got sick.
Will the tide shift over the next quarter?  Stay tuned.



Tuesday's Number: $1,766,483

Tuesday is the day my local paper, the Syracuse Post-Standard, publishes the weekly business section. In addition to special features, tips from stock experts, budgeting advice and the like, we get the judgment and bankruptcy listings.  

As I did for much of last year, I will be tracking health care related filings. I include anything that is clearly a debt owed to a hospital, nursing home, physician or physician group, medical supplier, and so on; I do not include filings by insurance companies, many of which are so diversified it would not be a fair assumption that the filing is related to medical care or health insurance.  Note that the paper only publishes accounts of at least $5,000.

We have a milestone today -- it's the first time this year the weekly total has reached seven figures. Not much cause for celebration, really, but a milestone none-the-less.

This week, thirty-five people were listed with new judgments totaling $1,586,421 to hospitals, doctors, or other medical providers.  This is more than double the previous high week for this year, and a couple hundred thousand dollars higher than the highest total during the 24 weeks I tracked these figures last year.

This week, two people were listed as having satisfied judgments totaling $49,908 to a hospital, doctor, or other medical provider.  

And finally, this week there were two health-care related bankruptcies listed, totaling $130,148, easily the highest bankruptcy figure we've had in many weeks; in fact, this week's total is greater than the previous twelve weeks combined.